Thursday, May 18, 2006

Nicole Kidman Goes Brown...

She is doing a new movie with Noah Baumbach in New York and apparently for the role she had to darken her hair. I like blond hair just fine but I really think she looks better with her natural dark hair. Take a look at the pics and enlarge, she looks younger and less botoxed. What do you guys think Better Blond or Better Brunette?
I'm just glad those awful tapered jeans are for a movie and not because she thinks they look good.
Tapered is a NO-NO! In fact it's a HELL TO THE NO!

10 Comments:

Blogger Berry said...

Brown... definitely brown. She really does look older as a blond.

p.s. - I hear tapered jeans are coming back, my friend! LOL

5/18/2006 10:56:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I was thinking the same thing before I read your last line. actually I wa thinking "I had those jeans in high school".

Just say NO, Nicole.

I like her with red hair, too.

5/18/2006 11:11:00 AM  
Blogger Bea said...

Brunette-much better with darker locks.

5/18/2006 01:35:00 PM  
Blogger Heather said...

I love the brown. She just looks funky with blond hair.

And I loved the redheaded "Shannon" look even better. Just thinking of "Far and Away" makes me long for the days when Tom was still attractive and not just crazy. Come back, Tom!

5/18/2006 07:26:00 PM  
Blogger Lisa said...

I love the brown.

5/19/2006 06:28:00 PM  
Blogger Lena said...

I actually thought this was her OWN child for a second and thought 'Finally! She's seen with children!'.

But, no.

Also, the pants: no.

5/20/2006 04:03:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

She looks great with red or brown, blonde does nothing for her at all. I find it funny that the botox runours only started when she went blonde, 4 days before these set of pics were taken she was at the UNIFEM event with blonde hair, people were going on about her being botox, here she is dark-haired and she looks younger and softer, not unless she has found botox that lasts just a few days and not weeks.

lena, you will be hard pressed to find pics of Kidman and her kids, this is not a new thing for her not to be photographed with them, she has been seen with them where she lives (Nashville) and even New York but pics are a big NO, NO even when they are on the set with her, you won't see pics, pics of Kidman, herself, are very rare. She has been in NY for over a month and I have seen just 3 sets of pics of her off the set. Good for her, people have seen enough of her kids playing baseball and soccer, they should take a break from the spotlight. All these talk of she is never with her kids started simply because their father decided it was ok to let them being photographed despite insisting that he doesn't want them to be paparazzi fodder until last year, they were protected from the paparazzi, do you think the kids just started doing sports? lol

She and celebrities able to bring their kids up without their lives being documented get 2 thumbs up from me.

5/22/2006 12:30:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

lena, her kids are 12 and 14 years old, they shouldn't be hanging out with their mom or dad, they are too old for that crap. Kids their age are hanging out all over American malls. not sitting with mom and dad like they have no friends!

5/22/2006 12:32:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

She is not just less botoxed, she doesn't look botoxed at all. Blonde hairs simply messes her up. She was made a redhead for a reason.

5/22/2006 12:33:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

She didn't dye her hair, she is wearing a wig. She always wears wigs in her movies, always!

5/25/2006 04:24:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home